Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Are Meyle control arms really this bad?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    662
    My Cars
    1990 3.5L 525iM

    Are Meyle control arms really this bad?

    I replaced all four control arms up front with Meyle units on my 525i less than 3,000 miles ago. It seemingly cured my vibration problems up front.

    Well I have horrendous vibration at 55mph right now. It's gotten progressively worse since the install. It also vibrates on decel.

    Could they really have gone bad in 3,000 miles?
    Black on black 525i with an M30B35 swap, 5 speed, shifter that falls off, chip, 4.10 rear, Style 123 wheels, 262,000 miles and getting better all the time.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,309
    My Cars
    17 330i Touring M-sport

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    5,215
    My Cars
    e30 e34
    You have hubcentric rings on your wheels? Correct? If so, then yes, sounds like they are bad. What did you replace? Upper/lower ca's, tie rod ends, idler arms, center link?
    '88 s54 e30, '00 m5

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,806
    My Cars
    99 M3, 90 535iA, 89 325is
    Quote Originally Posted by Isaacus View Post
    I replaced all four control arms up front with Meyle units on my 525i less than 3,000 miles ago. It seemingly cured my vibration problems up front.

    Well I have horrendous vibration at 55mph right now. It's gotten progressively worse since the install. It also vibrates on decel.

    Could they really have gone bad in 3,000 miles?
    You torque to spec at normal ride hieght?
    bmwpower / bmwcca 147895 / 05 X5 / 99 M3 / 90 535i / 89 325is track project

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    2,309
    My Cars
    e36, e34, e28 (rip)
    its possible, but as stated above, make sure you have addressed everything in the front end before pointing the finger.

    BMW Parts Whore... BUY THEM PLEASE!!!

  6. #6
    adriver is offline Why would I be sarcastic?
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    FeenX, AZ
    Posts
    2,091
    My Cars
    slick 95 tourin s52/5spd
    recheck all your torque specs.
    I can't drive automatics.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    5,188
    My Cars
    91 M5, 90 525i & 04 M3
    Meyle kinda of the middle of the road.

    It's the Hamburg Tech stuff that goes south fast.

    I'd go over everything and make sure it's thight.

    The torque at ride height is the source of a lot of short lived front ends.
    Insert enhanced picture of car here:___________

    Insert a trite & witty quote here:___________

    Insert a list of fictitious modifications here:___________

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,806
    My Cars
    99 M3, 90 535iA, 89 325is
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzkrieg Bob View Post
    Meyle kinda of the middle of the road.

    It's the Hamburg Tech stuff that goes south fast.

    I'd go over everything and make sure it's thight.

    The torque at ride height is the source of a lot of short lived front ends.
    I'm even wondering about retorquing at ride heigh again since I didn't go through the process of measuring the ride height, etc. I just placed the car on 4 ramps, squished it down really good, then torqued.
    bmwpower / bmwcca 147895 / 05 X5 / 99 M3 / 90 535i / 89 325is track project

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    823
    My Cars
    2002 330Ci, 2002 530i
    Quote Originally Posted by Blitzkrieg Bob View Post
    Meyle kinda of the middle of the road.

    It's the Hamburg Tech stuff that goes south fast.

    I'd go over everything and make sure it's thight.

    The torque at ride height is the source of a lot of short lived front ends.
    So how do you guys weigh down your cars to tighten these, anyway? I'm going to be doing mine soon, and thought of buying a bunch of free weights, but wasn't sure if that much concentrated weight would be bad for the seats. And sandbags are kind of messy.
    BMW CCA #353833
    2002 530i, 2002 330Ci


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,806
    My Cars
    99 M3, 90 535iA, 89 325is
    Quote Originally Posted by glwillia View Post
    So how do you guys weigh down your cars to tighten these, anyway? I'm going to be doing mine soon, and thought of buying a bunch of free weights, but wasn't sure if that much concentrated weight would be bad for the seats. And sandbags are kind of messy.
    That would be a LOT of free weights. I think it called for several hundred pounds total.
    bmwpower / bmwcca 147895 / 05 X5 / 99 M3 / 90 535i / 89 325is track project

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    5,188
    My Cars
    91 M5, 90 525i & 04 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by glwillia View Post
    So how do you guys weigh down your cars to tighten these, anyway? I'm going to be doing mine soon, and thought of buying a bunch of free weights, but wasn't sure if that much concentrated weight would be bad for the seats. And sandbags are kind of messy.
    I just drive slowly around the block with everything hand tight, then roll up on to the ramps and torque it all down.
    Insert enhanced picture of car here:___________

    Insert a trite & witty quote here:___________

    Insert a list of fictitious modifications here:___________

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    823
    My Cars
    2002 330Ci, 2002 530i
    Quote Originally Posted by bmwpower View Post
    That would be a LOT of free weights. I think it called for several hundred pounds total.
    150 lbs in each of the front seats and in the rear, 50 lbs in the trunk, and a full tank of gas, if I recall correctly. So 20 25-lb free weights in total, which is a lot now that I think about it...
    BMW CCA #353833
    2002 530i, 2002 330Ci


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    430
    My Cars
    1992 535i ,building s38-e30
    Ok i hear the name lemforder thrown around and shamefully it isnt familiar to me. I did purchase a fcp groton kit with the aluminum lower controls (mine has alum oem) well turns out the box it all came in was the most durable part. 4000 kilometers later its all garbage. so far i bought a set of meyle thrust arms and urethane bushings from bmp. as for tie rods and ball joints ect. i want something that can atleast be greased, its ridiculas for a performance sedan to be equiped with components that can't be maintained

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Great White North
    Posts
    11,300
    My Cars
    various
    Quote Originally Posted by black535 View Post
    Ok i hear the name lemforder thrown around and shamefully it isnt familiar to me. I did purchase a fcp groton kit with the aluminum lower controls (mine has alum oem) well turns out the box it all came in was the most durable part. 4000 kilometers later its all garbage. so far i bought a set of meyle thrust arms and urethane bushings from bmp. as for tie rods and ball joints ect. i want something that can atleast be greased, its ridiculas for a performance sedan to be equiped with components that can't be maintained
    Lemforder = OEM

    More expensive but well worth it IMHO.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    287
    My Cars
    95 525I
    its not the brakes? wheels offbalance?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    5,188
    My Cars
    91 M5, 90 525i & 04 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by black535 View Post
    i want something that can atleast be greased, its ridiculas for a performance sedan to be equiped with components that can't be maintained

    Never seen any BMWs with zerk fittings.
    Insert enhanced picture of car here:___________

    Insert a trite & witty quote here:___________

    Insert a list of fictitious modifications here:___________

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    430
    My Cars
    1992 535i ,building s38-e30
    neither have I Bob. But a more durable and servicable part made available sure would be a thing of beauty. And thanks for the direction on the lemforder name Zubbie..I thought meyle was oem, guess i still got some learnin to do.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Longwood, FL
    Posts
    5,884
    My Cars
    '93 E30, '01 E46 Mtec I
    What I have found with suspesion parts, and I am sure the group will agree, is that if you have to replace one part, replace them all.

    What happens, is when you replace certain parts, it puts more stress on the older parts, causing them to go out quicker.

    I just replaced the front end on my '93 E30. EVERYTHING got replaced.
    IF MY CAPS OFFEND YOU, BLOCK ME.
    AND IF YOU NOTICE THE FIRST LETTER OF EACH WORD CAP'ED...... IT'S DONE AUTOMATICALLY BY THE FORUM BECAUSE I TYPE IN ALL CAPS.BUT IT DOESN'T ALWAYS DO THIS, LIKE WHEN I QUOTE OTHER POSTS.AND IF YOU DON'T LIKE THAT, REFER TO FIRST SENTENCE IN MY SIG.







  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    5,188
    My Cars
    91 M5, 90 525i & 04 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by black535 View Post
    neither have I Bob. But a more durable and servicable part made available sure would be a thing of beauty. And thanks for the direction on the lemforder name Zubbie..I thought meyle was oem, guess i still got some learnin to do.
    You'll see lots of names that supply BMW, Lemforder is the top self for suspension, Meyle is in the middle, and then there's Hamburg Tech if you like doing the job again in the near future.

    Other OEM suppliers are Febi, Sachs/Boge, Bosch ...the list goes on since each part category has it's "preferred" supplier.

    I am not afraid to use the "lessor" brands for non critial parts, something that if it failed after 10K...I could just buy it again for $24..and pop it in over an afternoon and a few beers.
    Insert enhanced picture of car here:___________

    Insert a trite & witty quote here:___________

    Insert a list of fictitious modifications here:___________

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    430
    My Cars
    1992 535i ,building s38-e30
    Yes i agree with the non critical parts comment. so whats the deal with some e34's having aluminum control arms and others steel. It is an obvious benifit to reduce unsprung weight..but why have both..any ideas?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    5,188
    My Cars
    91 M5, 90 525i & 04 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by black535 View Post
    Yes i agree with the non critical parts comment. so whats the deal with some e34's having aluminum control arms and others steel. It is an obvious benifit to reduce unsprung weight..but why have both..any ideas?
    I dunno, my Touring & M5 have the aluminum arms...It's not that much weight loss for a 3600lb beast.

    The 525 has steel, and I just replaced them with steel...Lemforder aluminums $$$
    Insert enhanced picture of car here:___________

    Insert a trite & witty quote here:___________

    Insert a list of fictitious modifications here:___________

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Lake Lanier
    Posts
    8,754
    My Cars
    E34 540i6 M Sport
    In one word yes. Lemforder is the only way to go.

    95 540i6 M Sport - 95 525it S52/OBD2 - 433k E36 328i5 - X5D that hit a pothole - IG: @justinmurray95

  23. #23
    moroza's Avatar
    moroza is offline MORΩN ΛABIA BMW CCA Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    BFE
    Posts
    11,095
    My Cars
    E34T
    The idea behind torquing at full load is so that when you go driving later, there isn't an average deviation from where they want to be.

    In other words, if you don't, there's going to be a constant twisting stress on the bushing when you drive the car. The frame bolt will be holding the bushing at one angle, and the rest of the arm, which follows the road, will be twisting it upwards almost all the time. You want the angle of the bushing to be the same as the angle of the suspension arm. Theoretically, at all times, but in practice, whenever the suspension is at normal rest, i.e weighed down as it normally would be. Constant stress = premature failure.

    I measured ride height until it was within 3mm of spec, disregarding weight. It was good enough that I drove 3200 miles starting a couple of days later, and it's still fine now.

    Certainly not the first "I bought non-Lemförder suspension parts 2 miles ago and now my suspension is shot" thread I've seen... I know that $105 for a piece of steel and rubber sounds a bit pricey, but it's better than paying half of that, several times.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,806
    My Cars
    99 M3, 90 535iA, 89 325is
    Quote Originally Posted by moroza View Post
    The idea behind torquing at full load is so that when you go driving later, there isn't an average deviation from where they want to be.

    In other words, if you don't, there's going to be a constant twisting stress on the bushing when you drive the car. The frame bolt will be holding the bushing at one angle, and the rest of the arm, which follows the road, will be twisting it upwards almost all the time. You want the angle of the bushing to be the same as the angle of the suspension arm. Theoretically, at all times, but in practice, whenever the suspension is at normal rest, i.e weighed down as it normally would be. Constant stress = premature failure.

    I measured ride height until it was within 3mm of spec, disregarding weight. It was good enough that I drove 3200 miles starting a couple of days later, and it's still fine now.

    Certainly not the first "I bought non-Lemförder suspension parts 2 miles ago and now my suspension is shot" thread I've seen... I know that $105 for a piece of steel and rubber sounds a bit pricey, but it's better than paying half of that, several times.
    Well, it sounds to me that the ride height spec is there so that they are preloaded when torqued. I don't drive around town with my gas tank always full, 50 lbs in the trunk and another passenger all the time, etc. etc. If that's how they want it torqued, then when you drive it normally by yourself (like I do 99% of the time) the bushing is NOT going to be inline, it will be twisted some. I wonder how much it really is twisted...
    bmwpower / bmwcca 147895 / 05 X5 / 99 M3 / 90 535i / 89 325is track project

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    34
    My Cars
    1990 525i 1998 740i
    I put Meyle lower control arms on my 90 525 18 months ago and have had no problems you might have other issues.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •