Bimmerforums Upgrade Garage The Tire Rack
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: 255/40/17 on an 8in wide wheel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330

    255/40/17 on an 8in wide wheel

    Will it fit?

    I'm going to need new tires soon. I'll be buying Falken Fk452's. I want them as wide as I can fit 'em.

    OE tire size is 235/45/17

    Thanks!
    Last edited by brandon5069; 10-09-2007 at 07:58 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    Lil help fellas?

  3. #3
    llegos's Avatar
    llegos is offline Internet Superhero BMW CCA Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    3,244
    My Cars
    2004 330i ZHP
    they will fit, but the tread is too wide, leading to sidewall flex which means handling will suffer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    That's what I was afraid of.....

    245's it is....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Tonawanda, NY
    Posts
    705
    My Cars
    95 540i/6, 07 X3
    Try this...
    Tire Size Comparator

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckNaked View Post
    According to that calculator I should be fine....


    Seeing as I'm not tracking my car, just having fun in the canyons, I may have to give it a go....

    Franka, a member here, has been running 275's on a 9in wide wheels for years now. He says he has no problems. If he can run 275's I should be able to run 255's....right?

    Anyone else have some input? 255's all around sounds awful tempting...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    2,932
    My Cars
    1997 M3/4/5
    Quote Originally Posted by brandon5069 View Post
    According to that calculator I should be fine....


    Seeing as I'm not tracking my car, just having fun in the canyons, I may have to give it a go....

    Franka, a member here, has been running 275's on a 9in wide wheels for years now. He says he has no problems. If he can run 275's I should be able to run 255's....right?

    Anyone else have some input? 255's all around sounds awful tempting...
    It's physically possible(just like running 195's on an 8" wheel), but it's not going to be ideal for handling.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bloomington, Illinois
    Posts
    6,189
    My Cars
    2011 E92 M3, 2007 335i
    Minimum size per Falken website is 8.5" with 9" wheel recommended.
    Now in E92 M3 ZCP -- Absolute beast

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    I recenly discovered that the STI and EVO guys have been running 255's on their OE 8in wide wheels for a while now without ill effect. I guess I'll be one of the first in the bimmer community to give it a try....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Camarillo, CA (Ventura)
    Posts
    7,364
    My Cars
    '05 Ram 1500
    I absolutely don't recommend it. Go with a 235/40-17 for the best handling possible on your wheel setup.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    Quote Originally Posted by SQ Bimmer View Post
    I absolutely don't recommend it. Go with a 235/40-17 for the best handling possible on your wheel setup.
    Have you run this setup before?

  12. #12
    joenationwide's Avatar
    joenationwide is offline Makes Cars Dance BMW E36 M3 Expert
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Leesburg, Virginia
    Posts
    4,210
    My Cars
    95 M3 (GTS2), 99 M3
    Quote Originally Posted by SQ Bimmer View Post
    I absolutely don't recommend it. Go with a 235/40-17 for the best handling possible on your wheel setup.
    +1. Trust us, 255 will feel mushy, unresponsive, vague. 235 will feel better and make transitions crisper. This advice comes from experience.

    Dont think so? Here's a similar example. Check out the latest Grassroots tire test. They tested four 285mm tires and one 245mm tire on an 8" rim. The 245 was the fastest.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SAN DIEGO
    Posts
    79
    My Cars
    97 540i/6 s/c VFE
    yea, on my 540i i run OE wheels with 245/45/17 Bridgestones on all four sides. No rubbing at all and even looks somewhat wide from the back.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Camarillo, CA (Ventura)
    Posts
    7,364
    My Cars
    '05 Ram 1500
    Quote Originally Posted by brandon5069 View Post
    Have you run this setup before?
    No, and I never would, because I already know what I would be sacrificing.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    4,375
    My Cars
    98 M3/4/5
    i run a 275/40/17 on my 17x9.5's course this is on a Z28.. but a wheel is a wheel.. they fit perfectly with no "mushroom" effect.

    having said that.. i have once ran a 255 on a 8" wide tire and the mushroom was terrible. Remember though.. certain tires run wider than others from different manufacturer's.. on a 8" wide wheel.. i would only use a 245.. for 9" i would use a 255.. for 9.5" a 275.. and a 10" a 275, 285 or 295.. depending on what brand tire.
    98 Estoril ///M3 4/6
    S54 swap CSL

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    3,953
    My Cars
    E36 M3, E46 M3
    dude don't do it. I have 255/40/17 on my 9.5 inch wide wheels. Your sidewalls are going to flex way too much. its just too much for an 8 inch wide wheel. I'm even thinking of going with 245s so I don't rub.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    1,125
    My Cars
    99 MCoupe
    Quote Originally Posted by joenationwide View Post
    +1. Trust us, 255 will feel mushy, unresponsive, vague. 235 will feel better and make transitions crisper. This advice comes from experience.

    Dont think so? Here's a similar example. Check out the latest Grassroots tire test. They tested four 285mm tires and one 245mm tire on an 8" rim. The 245 was the fastest.
    If your quote showed 265mm vs 245mm I might see your point. But of course something as massive as 285mm isn't going to be right on a 8". He was asking if it would work to stretch the sidewall, not blow it out of the water.
    I have oil in my blood; that is my dedication level to cars.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    Ok....
    What if I was to use a tire that had a stiff sidewall? Maybe something like a Falken RT615...

    Would this help?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    4,375
    My Cars
    98 M3/4/5
    Quote Originally Posted by brandon5069 View Post
    Ok....
    What if I was to use a tire that had a stiff sidewall? Maybe something like a Falken RT615...

    Would this help?

    no.. it wont..it will make mounting them a bitch for whom ever is going to do it.. it would actually make it worse because that stiff sidewall wants to be at vertical to the wheel and you;re trying to make it at a slight mushroom angle..

    just dont do it.. learn from others that have already tried..
    98 Estoril ///M3 4/6
    S54 swap CSL

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    socal
    Posts
    9,971
    My Cars
    2002, 528i, LS430, RX330
    Quote Originally Posted by SpitFire5 View Post
    just dont do it.. learn from others that have already tried..

    See that's the thing. The STI and EVO guys have tried with success. No one here has done this....

    The tire width will be ~125% of the wheel width. I don't think the ballooning will be too bad...

    We'll see...I'm still reading...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    4,375
    My Cars
    98 M3/4/5
    Quote Originally Posted by brandon5069 View Post
    See that's the thing. The STI and EVO guys have tried with success. No one here has done this....

    The tire width will be ~125% of the wheel width. I don't think the ballooning will be too bad...

    We'll see...I'm still reading...
    and you missed a key factor here... certain tires run wider than others.. find out what brand they are using.. and go from there..BFG tires typically run wider than other manufacturer's tires.. other brands are smaller and you might get away with it.. but you're also compairing apples to oranges.. you said STi guys and EVO guys.. their fender wells, brake systems, and backspacing also come into play for rubbing issues..

    how about this.. since you know STi people and EVO people are doing it.. have them post pictures so you can see it..
    98 Estoril ///M3 4/6
    S54 swap CSL

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    2,932
    My Cars
    1997 M3/4/5
    ok, if you run this setup your car won't explode, it just won't have crisp handling....and the tires will look a little like fat muscle car tires to those of us used to trying to maximize handling. It's your car, do what you want.
    Last edited by Sammyzuko; 10-16-2007 at 02:44 PM.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Pedro, California
    Posts
    1,152
    My Cars
    88M3-89M3-91MTech-98528i
    245/40/17's work well as a plus 0 setup on the stock sport 17x8 wheels.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    92
    My Cars
    2000 BMW 540iA
    Since I am in the same identical situation (factory 17x8 wheels using OEM tire size 235/45R17), it looks like most favor using a tire even smaller than the factory setup for best, crisp handling: 235/40R17. So the order of preference for best handling, having the same tire size front/back, is then:

    1) 235/40R17 (slightly smaller)

    2) 235/45R17 (OEM size)

    3) 245/45R17 (slightly larger)


    Did I summarize this well? Wouldn't make sense to consider also a 245/40R17 size as well? Pros/cons?

    Option 1 is preferred over the OEM for having slightly smaller/shorter sidewalls? Which is probably why option 3 is the least favored, right?
    Last edited by wquiles; 10-21-2007 at 09:57 AM.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Duesseldorf, NRW, Germany
    Posts
    6,857
    My Cars
    '90 850iM70B54, '91 850i
    Looks to me that the author of this thread wants to get the wide tires despite the recommendation of all the posters here.
    So let him make his own experience, blow unnecessary money for a tire way too wide for the rim and giving poor performance on top of it.
    JMHO
    Wolf



Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •