E82 135i: Alpine white on black leather; ZSP; ZCW; iPod/USB
Previous Bimmers owned (from last to first): E46 M3, E34 540i/6, E30 325iS, E34 525i, E30 318i
I hope you are kidding? That has gotta be the craziest statment I've read on the forums.
3 SERIES IS BMW'S BEST CAR. It is the product that the company spent the most resource on. The most time and money spent in research/development. Most in marketing/advertising. Do you know how many patents were filed everytime a 3 series comes out? It is the benchmark where every car company look up to. Everything else is playing catch up. So many features on the 3 is world's first and only. No other car company rely so much on one product. 57% of all BMW world wide sales is a 3 series. Designers, engineers, executives, center employees, we wouldn't have a job if the 3 series fails. Is without a doubt the most important, most influential, best received automobile in the last 2 decades.
Whereas the Audi A4 is a tweaked, cosmetically enhanced, cross platform, put-together overnight VW.
Current: 2012 Porsche Boxster Spyder, 2012 X5 xDrive 35d
Current demo: 2012 528xi
Past: 1994 Porshce 964 3.6 turbo, 1999 M3 cv, 2000 323ci 2006 Z4 3.0si, 2009 335i Mcp, 2010 535xiT
Come now, I gave considerable praise to the 5-series! A class dominator! I came from a mid-engined car, so the BMW really doesn't handle that well to me. Maybe that's why I am so critical of it, and don't have that much passion?
And there is no doubt the 3-series is the most important car for BMW. Just as the Passat is the most important car for VW, it's not their best car by any means. The 3 just doesn't have the luxury of the 5 or 7. And it doesn't have the sportiness of a real sports car. Well balanced, but excels in nothing? Only the 1-series will be worse.
Why? AMG is mercedes. Here is another example....
2007 MERCEDES-BENZ SL550
weight 5013 lb
0-60 4.7 (damn that is slow, so slow, it would beat an e46 m3)
Here is my opinion - people have a hard time saying BMW and Merc are in the same class. Merc is slightly geared more towards a smooth ride/less sporty and a little more lux while BMW is more of a divers car with a little less lux. To say that because a car is lux. it is slow is retarded. Well unless a rocket car is your definition of fast.... If you think that BMW is NOT a lux car you are retarded too. Give me a break. If that were the case only Rolls and Bentlys would be lux cars (oh ya they are pretty fast too)
Mods: stockish. 2980lbs. I need to lose more weight but can't give up my heated seats etc. Stock LSD FTW. 11/18/08: Need to reweigh with much lighter coilovers.
At least mercedes is putting out good looking cars...
Lexus is the luxury leader.
Well!! No harm intended. I just wanted to keep the comparison to a stock level. I owned/own several brands of cars and each car has it's strong areas. In the Lux line MB edges out BMW. Then there is Bentlys, Jaguars, etc. Jaguar has the most comfortable seats and leather appointments than any car I have ever driven.
I would say so, Mercedes to me personally has never appealed to me, BMW always has. This coming from all of the international auto-shows I've been to
looking at the new 3 series dont the c series MB have more hp? (same price range)
idk still pic a bmw over a mb though. but then again if someone handed me either i'd take em.
This is my Signature.
In a corner. Contrary to riceboy gospel, horsepower can't make up for mass. See Newton's First Law.
FWIW, I would be perfectly happy for BMW to cede the luxury crown to Mercedes. Maybe then they wouldn't insist on loading up their new models with all sorts of gimmicky crap that adds mass and will be expensive to fix when (not if) it goes out.
2002 330ci Topaz Blue Metallic
+ mothereffing 1
For christ sake, an electroinc arm that hangds you the friggn seat belt in the new 3 coupe? Are you effing kidding me? HAve we stooped that low and lazy to not reach back 6 inches for a seat belt. And I wonder how that thats going to cost when that breaks, and who knows what other crap gets wired to it that will be shot as well.
BMW should continue to focus on its driver friendly state of mind and let MB take the damn luxury market. I can see M3's buzzing up canyons all day long, but seeing a MB tearing up canyons never really seems right to me, becasue i never see them doing it. Besides the 190e evo, that ish was baller lol. Not to say luxury = slow (AMG is the best example of that) Mash the throttle and go screamingly fast in straight line while sipping your latte is what MB alwasy was too me. I would not feel right tearing up turns in a MB over a BMW
Besides the 7 series, i think it would be a slap in the face to call a BMW fully luxurious. I just wish BMW would stop trying to compete against cars that aren't really in the same class. To me, there is no other car maker thats in the same class as BMW....theyre just so damn neutral theyre good at anything and hard to classify.
Give me a modern day e30 with a kick ass engine and im happy
Mods: stockish. 2980lbs. I need to lose more weight but can't give up my heated seats etc. Stock LSD FTW. 11/18/08: Need to reweigh with much lighter coilovers.
I'm not speaking of sales exclusively. Lexus is the luxury leader because they put out luxury cars that rival the fit and finish of the Germans while being more reliable and having a lower overall cost of ownership. When you spend a lot of money on a luxury car it better not have any build quality issues like some of the BMW,MERCEDES,and AUDI vehicles.
So what is a conclusion? BMW is status symbol for md class people? Note people always tell compliments to your BMW, like how can you afford this car?
- Oh I paid just $3k for this 25 yo car.
or Is it new model BMW? I never seen such before?
- Oh, it is just 25 yo BMW, but I detail it twice a day.
Mid class people is the fundament of society, everything is based on their hard work and mid class people deserve to drive decent cars as BMW are.
I just think....
Im not saying MB is bad or anything..
but MB is too overrated.
OB
Honestly, I think you are being just plain ignorant, it's really irritating to read. If BMWs are for the middle class, then why do pro athletes and celebrities drive what MOST consider to be "baller" cars like the E65/E66, E63, etc.? Dude, a BMW isn't a middle-class car...their prices are plain and clear evidence of this. No "middle-class" layman can afford a $45k-100k car...and I don't mean stretch their finances to LEASE, I mean really afford.
E82 135i: Alpine white on black leather; ZSP; ZCW; iPod/USB
Previous Bimmers owned (from last to first): E46 M3, E34 540i/6, E30 325iS, E34 525i, E30 318i
bmw!
I'd say they are very similar until you step into an S class.
Rule the Bends, Bend the Rules
I think you, like a lot of people on this forum, would love to have a super-stripped down sports car. Which makes me wonder why you like BMW in the first place? The Japanese offer stripped models like the LanEvo RS, Integra Type R, etc. These cars for example embody exactly what you want. OH wait, it's not RWD.
BMW is a luxury brand. Good thing too. I want more comfort, more features, less road noise(oh my, add weight?), and still a sporty driving experience. Doesn't make sense to compromise luxury for sportiness if you are in the luxury segment.
Bookmarks