View Full Version : 540iSC Dyno Results
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 12:57 PM http://www.turbochargingdynamics.com/Gallery/pics/624_1203958252.jpg
Peak of 328rwhp @ 4.7psi
Peak of 299rwtq @ 3.0psi
http://www.turbochargingdynamics.com/video/540SC.wmv
SAE numbers 3% lower due to cold ambient temps.
The potential of this motor is pretty amazing considering the paltry amount of boost and inefficient way it is being delivered.
I am ordering a smaller pulley today to bump the boost 2psi. I'll be happy in the 365-370rwhp range.
Dinan non intercooled setup and TCD exhaust. Auto tranny. Otherwise stock.
atlfokus 02-25-2008, 01:01 PM nice!
xatlas0 02-25-2008, 02:02 PM Not much of a torque boost, but 70 hp from 5 psi is pretty darned impressive. Based on some of the other M60B40 dynos, it looks like ~40 lb-ft.
Still, like you said, given the minimal boost and the method of delivery, it would seem there is a lot of potential in the motor.
Turn up the boost pronto!!!
Jcbe34 02-25-2008, 02:08 PM What would it take from a tuning standpoint to supercharge the m60 without buying a kit? Seems like it wouldn't be too difficult. A lot less plumbing than building a turbo kit from scratch..
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 02:33 PM What would it take from a tuning standpoint to supercharge the m60 without buying a kit? Seems like it wouldn't be too difficult. A lot less plumbing than building a turbo kit from scratch..
I would agree but it's not exactly easy. The bracket and crank hub pulley are the two biggest obstacles.
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 02:34 PM Not much of a torque boost, but 70 hp from 5 psi is pretty darned impressive. Based on some of the other M60B40 dynos, it looks like ~40 lb-ft.
Still, like you said, given the minimal boost and the method of delivery, it would seem there is a lot of potential in the motor.
This an automatic car. I think it is reasonable to think that it would dyno at 240/250 stock.
Todd
E34nication 02-25-2008, 03:30 PM What would it take from a tuning standpoint to supercharge the m60 without buying a kit? Seems like it wouldn't be too difficult. A lot less plumbing than building a turbo kit from scratch..
I bet you could just buy a chip from someone like ESS... otherwise get Goathumper to get the m60 megasquirt rolling.
E34nication 02-25-2008, 03:31 PM This an automatic car. I think it is reasonable to think that it would dyno at 240/250 stock.
Todd
very impressive #'s from low boost and an automatic. I would think the autos are putting down 240ish at the wheels..??..
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 03:38 PM I bet you could just buy a chip from someone like ESS... otherwise get Goathumper to get the m60 megasquirt rolling.
I am going to install MS in this car if/when I build a single turbo for it.
E34nication 02-25-2008, 03:41 PM I am going to install MS in this car if/when I build a single turbo for it.
I'm sure that if/when that happens I will be part of the bidding war for your s/c.
5271990 02-25-2008, 04:02 PM Whats that at the crank with out drivetrain loss ~360bhp or more because its an auto ?
Pretty darn good for a none intercooled, low boost off the shelf generic tune.
Any plans to tweek the tuning before raising boost to see what you can reliably get out of her.
If there's no space for an aftercooler what about water/meth injection? Not the same I know but it helps, no?
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 04:13 PM I just ordered a one step smaller pulley (+2psi) :D
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 04:17 PM Whats that at the crank with out drivetrain loss ~360bhp or more because its an auto ?
Pretty darn good for a none intercooled, low boost off the shelf generic tune.
Any plans to tweek the tuning before raising boost to see what you can reliably get out of her.
If there's no space for an aftercooler what about water/meth injection? Not the same I know but it helps, no?
It's totally reliable. It's been on the car since 1997!
There really is no space to add an intercooler and WI isn't a good idea without having control of the tune and adding timing.
I am sure the +2psi will keep me happy until I can decide how to turbo charge it.
My guess at crank HP is ~380to 390.
5271990 02-25-2008, 04:39 PM It's totally reliable. It's been on the car since 1997!
There really is no space to add an intercooler and WI isn't a good idea without having control of the tune and adding timing.
I am sure the +2psi will keep me happy until I can decide how to turbo charge it.
My guess at crank HP is ~380to 390.
I love Boostjunky logic :stickoutt:D
There is just about space for a turbo, lol
356rwhp/373rwt @ 8psi
OT. Was it you that was working on full fuel control with chip tunes and if yes how did it go?
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 05:36 PM Link to video added.
BigM62 02-25-2008, 06:37 PM I am going to install MS in this car if/when I build a single turbo for it.
Please lrt me know on the turbo.I would be very interested,otherwise there is a company that is working on a T/S for the M60/62.
BigM62 02-25-2008, 06:39 PM It's totally reliable. It's been on the car since 1997!
There really is no space to add an intercooler and WI isn't a good idea without having control of the tune and adding timing.
I am sure the +2psi will keep me happy until I can decide how to turbo charge it.
My guess at crank HP is ~380to 390.
034 Motorsport made me a new chip for $600(with alittle help from Mark D).
BigM62 02-25-2008, 06:45 PM Todd I found my old dyno from '04(Edge Motorworks Dyno jet)I was at 4 psi and old M60 engine.It was a Dinan kit with Unichip poor tune.After this dyno run Erik repalced the plugs and I gained 12 rwhp
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/152/scanbb2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-25-2008, 06:51 PM Thanks for posting the dyno sheet. Looks right. Auto tranny consumes another ~5%.
Todd
clevertd 02-26-2008, 12:07 AM About time:D
Which is more fun, the M30 turbo or the M60 s/c?
About time:D
Which is more fun, the M30 turbo or the M60 s/c?
A well tuned turbo is much more fun than any supercharger
h2oplaydamian 02-26-2008, 12:13 AM http://www.turbochargingdynamics.com/Gallery/pics/624_1203958252.jpg
Peak of 328rwhp @ 4.7psi
Peak of 299rwtq @ 3.0psi
http://www.turbochargingdynamics.com/video/540SC.wmv
SAE numbers 3% lower due to cold ambient temps.
The potential of this motor is pretty amazing considering the paltry amount of boost and inefficient way it is being delivered.
I am ordering a smaller pulley today to bump the boost 2psi. I'll be happy in the 365-370rwhp range.
Dinan non intercooled setup and TCD exhaust. Auto tranny. Otherwise stock. you need water and meth injection when running more boost , i am running 11.8 psi in my v6 Tacoma with fuel mods, eaton m62 blower and when i added the meth and water it gave me 30 more HP
Ebay Cheep h2o and meth
clevertd 02-26-2008, 01:03 AM Also, no longer a supporting vendor?
A.W.O.L 02-26-2008, 01:30 AM solid numbers
Im impressed
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-26-2008, 02:44 PM About time:D
Which is more fun, the M30 turbo or the M60 s/c?
There is no doubt that a m30 running 12/13psi is much more fun but I really enjoy the way the 540i drives.
It has absolutley the best transmission of any car I have ever driven. It's fantastic. Combined with the 3.46lsd it's a model of efficiency.
I sure wish I could put this tranny behind a m30 turbo!
e34 540i6 02-26-2008, 02:51 PM A well tuned turbo is much more fun than any supercharger
i would have to agree
BigM62 02-26-2008, 03:03 PM A well tuned turbo is much more fun than any supercharger
:rolleyes.If you are ever in NorCal I will take you for a ride.Big displacement+S/C can be very exciting.Torge of V8+top end of S/C.
xatlas0 02-26-2008, 03:30 PM There is no doubt that a m30 running 12/13psi is much more fun but I really enjoy the way the 540i drives.
It has absolutley the best transmission of any car I have ever driven. It's fantastic. Combined with the 3.46lsd it's a model of efficiency.
I sure wish I could put this tranny behind a m30 turbo!
Just watch out for the check ball failure, it has been a total pain to deal with so far. I'm going on my 3rd trans since apparently, the only guy in the entire US that can rebuild these things is Kurt at ASU. My original one lasted ~150k miles, but the two rebuilds I've gotten have had issues in less than 5k.
Turbo Charg Dynam 02-26-2008, 03:58 PM :rolleyes.If you are ever in NorCal I will take you for a ride.Big displacement+S/C can be very exciting.Torge of V8+top end of S/C.
My m30 made 400rwtq at 3000rpm. My poor m60 had only like 1/2psi of boost at that rpm. A CF will never be a tq monster in comparison to it's HP on a m60/62.
No turbo it and actually have some boost at peak tq and it'll be a different story.
Sure a CF V8 is outstanding but it's not a m30 on big boost.
|