Itsablurr
08-27-2007, 10:05 AM
I'd like to start a little open discussion on a longer term project of mine.
Here is the scoop. I've always loved the 2002s. I had the good fortune of meeting a member on this (and other boards) by the name of vtbimmer in person with his beautiful *former* widebody.
http://img108.mytextgraphics.com/photolava/2007/08/27/vintagefest2006051-47mmb2xyo.jpg
My current ongoing project is a 1967 Chevelle that should be wrapped up come springtime next year. Next on the block is to pick up a round tail 2002 to strip for a new drivetrain, install a schnitzer style widebody, and do in more or less throwback track rat with some interesting twists.
My first intention was to plan out an S14 swap into it, or build up the stock mill.
Then I got this crazy idea. In the vintage muscle car arena, it is common for enthusiats to swap in modern LS1, LS2, LS6 drivetrains. Sometimes, the engines are back-engineered to remove all computer controls, stripped down to a basic long block, and built up using a carburetor and electronic ignition system.
Why could this not be applied to an engine like the S54? It is a more complex engine for sure, but at its core, it still functions under the same mechanical design as its predecessors. Remove vanos, remove the ignition, sensors, intake, etc.... and retrofit individual carburetors with mechanical throttle linkage, piggyback ignition, custom ground cams, etc. Build the core engine to function on mechanicals instead of software.
Has anything like this been back-engineered? What are some possible speed bumps? I am familiar with the engine, but not in the extreme depth that this would require. It would be the ultimate modern meets vintage melding that I could think of.
Here is the scoop. I've always loved the 2002s. I had the good fortune of meeting a member on this (and other boards) by the name of vtbimmer in person with his beautiful *former* widebody.
http://img108.mytextgraphics.com/photolava/2007/08/27/vintagefest2006051-47mmb2xyo.jpg
My current ongoing project is a 1967 Chevelle that should be wrapped up come springtime next year. Next on the block is to pick up a round tail 2002 to strip for a new drivetrain, install a schnitzer style widebody, and do in more or less throwback track rat with some interesting twists.
My first intention was to plan out an S14 swap into it, or build up the stock mill.
Then I got this crazy idea. In the vintage muscle car arena, it is common for enthusiats to swap in modern LS1, LS2, LS6 drivetrains. Sometimes, the engines are back-engineered to remove all computer controls, stripped down to a basic long block, and built up using a carburetor and electronic ignition system.
Why could this not be applied to an engine like the S54? It is a more complex engine for sure, but at its core, it still functions under the same mechanical design as its predecessors. Remove vanos, remove the ignition, sensors, intake, etc.... and retrofit individual carburetors with mechanical throttle linkage, piggyback ignition, custom ground cams, etc. Build the core engine to function on mechanicals instead of software.
Has anything like this been back-engineered? What are some possible speed bumps? I am familiar with the engine, but not in the extreme depth that this would require. It would be the ultimate modern meets vintage melding that I could think of.