Stop digging up 2+ year old threads, jesus. Do any of you guys doing this even remotely THINK about looking at the dates on the posts? :shifty

Werd and the last two I have seen have been from Micah and Jason at BSW... :shifty

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl - never know - we must learn from history...

Damn noobs can't f*cking read. The BSW thread was resurrected by some twit from TN who just joined this month.

At least he probably found the thread using the search button.

I honestly don't see how it happens. Maybe when it's already on the front page, replies can be excused ;), but when I'm doing a search, I always check the date, and when I notice I'm 800 pages into the subforum, I generally don't bump it.

I never read the date of a thread that is at the top.

And I know you rarely do either ken. If it is bumped to the top you don't check the first post for the date?

Bullshit.

Whats the problem? Maybe someone had the same problem as a 2 year old thread and the OP never posted back. By bumping it maybe someone can see it and respond with the solution to that problem.

Whats the problem? Maybe someone had the same problem as a 2 year old thread and the OP never posted back. By bumping it maybe someone can see it and respond with the solution to that problem.

who are you?

who are you?

ROFL

I never read the date of a thread that is at the top.

And I know you rarely do either ken. If it is bumped to the top you don't check the first post for the date?

Bullshit.

If it's already been bumped by some other idiot who bumped it to the top, then perhaps I will post without realizing it's old as hell. I'm saying, dipshit, DON'T REPLY TO THREADS WHERE THE LAST FUCKING POST WAS YEARS AGO!!!!! Is this really THAT hard of a concept to understand?

Whats the problem? Maybe someone had the same problem as a 2 year old thread and the OP never posted back. By bumping it maybe someone can see it and respond with the solution to that problem.

who are you?

Yeah, seriously, who the hell are you mang?

If it's already been bumped by some other idiot who bumped it to the top, then perhaps I will post without realizing it's old as hell. I'm saying, dipshit, DON'T REPLY TO THREADS WHERE THE LAST FUCKING POST WAS YEARS AGO!!!!! Is this really THAT hard of a concept to understand?

Yeah, seriously, who the hell are you mang?

+1 and yeah who the hell are you and why are you in here? :confused





Oh and IBTL! :buttrock

Does doing this start a count down to server distruction or something? I don't understand what the big deal is. If someone bumps a thread that is of interest to them and not to you, don't read it and/or bump it. It's that simple.
If someone started a NEW thread about the same topic, people would be bit**ing that they didn't do a search.

http://www.student.gsu.edu/~jhannay1/internet.jpg

give us noobs a break!!!

give us noobs a break!!!

No

This has nothing to do with bumping an old problem. That would be a good excuse in the technical forum. Or maybe I could see someone bumping an old tint thread and asking "how has your tint held up in the past two years" But this was about test fitting audio into cars from two years ago. I am really wondering what his search terms were to find that thread.

This has nothing to do with bumping an old problem. That would be a good excuse in the technical forum. Or maybe I could see someone bumping an old tint thread and asking "how has your tint held up in the past two years" But this was about test fitting audio into cars from two years ago. I am really wondering what his search terms were to find that thread.

It was actually 2 threads, that one, and one started by Leif in like, 2004, that kinda set me off. Both threads pertaining to nothing in 2007. Leif now lives in CA anyways.

Stop digging up 2+ year old threads, jesus. Do any of you guys doing this even remotely THINK about looking at the dates on the posts? :shifty

only one thing worse than that, and thats posting a thread about old threads and their new posters.

If it's already been bumped by some other idiot who bumped it to the top, then perhaps I will post without realizing it's old as hell.

so youre saying that you can make the same mistake as the old thread bumper......... you kinda just defeated your own argument.

only one thing worse than that, and thats posting a thread about old threads and their new posters.



so youre saying that you can make the same mistake as the old thread bumper......... you kinda just defeated your own argument.

Actually if you look at the last post date.. That would be today, not 2 years old. I even looked at this thread and thought "wow, when did I miss this thread"

The thread started by Leif was actually bumped from the dead twice. Does that mean we should be twice as angry?

No


luftan?!





(thats please in farsi for everybody else)

Stop digging up 2+ year old threads, jesus.
:ponder

Jesus doesn't bump threads, he resurrects them! :angel



:D

:ponder

Jesus doesn't bump threads, he resurrects them! :angel



:D:handclap

:smiliecap

only one thing worse than that, and thats posting a thread about old threads and their new posters.



so youre saying that you can make the same mistake as the old thread bumper......... you kinda just defeated your own argument.

I don't think I defeated my own argument at all. I've done it a couple of times, posted in a thread that somebody bumped to the top from sometimes 5+ years ago. It happens. The person who bumped it to the top should be the one asked why. Say, for instance, Kelly Childress's post about selling E30 interior parts from years ago, and somebody asking if he had seats for sale as if the post was recent :eyecrazy

Actually if you look at the last post date.. That would be today, not 2 years old. I even looked at this thread and thought "wow, when did I miss this thread"

Exactly.

The thread started by Leif was actually bumped from the dead twice. Does that mean we should be twice as angry?

Dam right :wavey

:ponder

Jesus doesn't bump threads, he resurrects them! :angel



:D

Hahahahahahaha.

luftan?!


(thats please in farsi for everybody else)


Especially No now. :confused

Did you learn your Farsi out in Monterrey by chance?

:ponder

Jesus doesn't bump threads, he resurrects them! :angel



:D

:lol:lol:lol

Especially No now.

Did you learn your Farsi out in Monterrey by chance?





No, I actually learned it from some local translator in Bagram... Im not sure if the stuff I know actually means what I think it does.

No, I actually learned it from some local translator in Bagram... Im not sure if the stuff I know actually means what I think it does.

For all you know you could have been asking for a cheeseburger.

No, I actually learned it from some local translator in Bagram... Im not sure if the stuff I know actually means what I think it does.

:rofl:

That's a good bet, they probably told you it meant one thing when it actually meant another. We taught a few of the locals over there sayings like "Don't make me open up a can on you" and "This ain't my first rodeo asshole". :rofl


Ahhhh, Good Times!! :buttrock

Making an Outlook reminder to bump this thread next summer ...

Does doing this start a count down to server distruction or something? I don't understand what the big deal is. If someone bumps a thread that is of interest to them and not to you, don't read it and/or bump it. It's that simple.
If someone started a NEW thread about the same topic, people would be bit**ing that they didn't do a search.

exactly! screwed either way....

only one thing worse than that, and thats posting a thread about old threads and their new posters.



so youre saying that you can make the same mistake as the old thread bumper......... you kinda just defeated your own argument.

pwnd.

That was my point :)

Does doing this start a count down to server distruction or something? I don't understand what the big deal is. If someone bumps a thread that is of interest to them and not to you, don't read it and/or bump it. It's that simple.
If someone started a NEW thread about the same topic, people would be bit**ing that they didn't do a search.

No it is seriously not a big deal at all :)

I'm surprised no one has thought to ask the question:

What is it with kendogg and NEW threads???

That's what the people really want to know...

I'm surprised no one has thought to ask the question:

What is it with kendogg and NEW threads???

That's what the people really want to know...


I like new threads :)

They can be full of relevant, or irrelevant information. However, they are usually fairly time-correct, whereas old threads are not.

I'm surprised no one has thought to ask the question:

What is it with kendogg and NEW threads???

That's what the people really want to know...

:rofl:

Attention Whore? That or trying to deflect attention away from his need to wear padded helmets.

:rofl:

Attention Whore? That or trying to deflect attention away from his need to wear padded helmets.

Almost every helmet is padded :confused

I'm surprised no one has thought to ask the question:
I've got a question, Mr. Hand Puppet... :shifty



It's been a few days now. Have you had lunch (http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10036057&postcount=61) yet? :confused


:stickoutt

Almost every helmet is padded :confused

On the outside?

I like new threads :)

They can be full of relevant, or irrelevant information. However, they are usually fairly time-correct, whereas old threads are not.

So what you are saying then is all the old threads are worthless.

Contain bad information or irrelevant information.


And it has been stated before. If you make a new post about something that has been answered you get yelled at.

I've got a question, Mr. Hand Puppet... :shifty



It's been a few days now. Have you had lunch (http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10036057&postcount=61) yet? :confused


:stickoutt

<3 Chester. I'll put 'em up before 2pm.

:embarrasm

So what you are saying then is all the old threads are worthless.

Contain bad information or irrelevant information.


And it has been stated before. If you make a new post about something that has been answered you get yelled at.

What most people haven't realized or learned yet it that you search on your topic, find the old thread, read old thread to see if question was answered correctly, then start new thread referencing old thread with your current problem or topic.

How hard is that to understand? :confused

Standard cross-referencing thread procedure.

Ibtl.

<3 Chester.
Dude! I didn't say I wanted to know what you'd been doing for the last few days! :eyecrazy


:D

I'll put 'em up before 2pm.
Much-as Gracie-us. :thumbup:

:cool

Ibtl.

:rofl:

See post #11 :devillook

Ibtl.

why does everything get locked?

I really don't understand it.


Also where did that thread with the local Forza Spec gamers go?

Itbl

I made it in, whee.

why does everything get locked?

I really don't understand it.



I am suppose to lock all threads that venture too far off topic. I think I have been very lenient in that regard. I let most threads go until they have run their course.

I am also suppose to tow or lock all threads that have no bearing on Georgia and/or BMW's...

I am supposed to lock all threads that venture too far off topic. I think I have been very lenient in that regard. I let most threads go until they have run their course.

We have a course? Is this like a DE? That would explain why Ken is wearing his helmet.

We have a course? Is this like a DE? That would explain why Ken is wearing his helmet.

bwhahhahaha

better get my +1 and

ibtl

That would explain why Ken is wearing his helmet.
I hear those Special Olympics After-Parties are bitchin'. :redspot

http://www.****************.com/*****/afterparty.jpg

Itbl

I made it in, whee.

We have a course? Is this like a DE? That would explain why Ken is wearing his helmet.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

No Ken just like wearing his helmet so he doesn't hurt himself

I hear those Special Olympics After-Parties are bitchin'. :redspot

http://www.****************.com/*****/afterparty.jpg

Ad a goatee and that actually would look a lot like Ken too! :devillook

Ad a goatee and that actually would look a lot like Ken too!
Hm. Can I get a p'chop done before the lock? :ponder

Cue up the "Mission: Impossible" music! :D

Hm. Can I get a p'chop done before the lock? :ponder

Cue up the "Mission: Impossible" music! :D

If so then :urtheman DW!

Note to Bill, hold lock until DW gets the P-Chop in!

http://www.****************.com/*****/afterparty2.jpg

:alright

So what you are saying then is all the old threads are worthless.

Contain bad information or irrelevant information.


And it has been stated before. If you make a new post about something that has been answered you get yelled at.

The thread from Jason was 100% irrelevant. The thread from Kelly was 100% irrelevant. Both due to age and nothing more. Get a grip dude. Look at the damn post, and actually THINK before you bump an old post.

Why are some of you guys really this dense? I guess I need to spell it out. Not ALL old threads are worthless. Lets go back to the E36 section years ago when people though removing VANOS was a good thing, or removing intake baffles, etc. We now know this is WRONG, and bumping these old-ass threads brings up irrelevant, old, BAD information. All I'm saying is read and actually think before bumping an ancient thread. Not all old posts are correct, or even relevant, to information available today.

No can you put this head on that body?

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y238/redefinedWRX/July%202007%20Road%20Atlanta/IMG_2028.jpg

What most people haven't realized or learned yet it that you search on your topic, find the old thread, read old thread to see if question was answered correctly, then start new thread referencing old thread with your current problem or topic.

How hard is that to understand? :confused

Standard cross-referencing thread procedure.


Jesus christ, about fucking time somebody understands. :shifty

http://www.****************.com/*****/afterparty2.jpg

:alright

Wow, it does look like Ken.

Wow, it does look like Ken.

See I told ya!!!!!