///M3me
05-30-2007, 07:43 PM
For sale is a set of H&R Sports Springs. Slightly Used. Roughly maybe 3000-4000 miles on them. Pics upon request.
Part number: 29910
$150+ shipping / Local Pick up available in San Francisco/Milpitas or Santa Cruz .
Thanks
:redspot
CRYPTiC
05-30-2007, 09:06 PM
That's a great price! Too bad I'm slow...
BTW, that part number is for a 95 M3, right? I think the 96+ have a different number.
hmsM3
05-30-2007, 10:11 PM
nevermind OP took too long to reply but i decided to go with race instead.
M3zie
05-30-2007, 10:31 PM
Dibs...payment pending.
///M3me let me know how you want the payment. I sent you a PM. Some pics would be nice showing the current condition/part numbers. Do you have the original H&R box with them?
///M3me
05-30-2007, 10:43 PM
PMed you guys back =)
(Ill try to get pics by tomorrow)
M3zie
06-01-2007, 09:05 AM
I'm out, found another set
///M3me
06-01-2007, 03:55 PM
So i took another look at the springs... and it has the following written on it to help clarrify which model M3 it for:
Fronts:
H&R 11/97
BMW M3
29910
Rears:
H&R
BMW M3
29936
Hope that helps.
CRYPTiC
06-01-2007, 04:33 PM
In case anyone one was wondering what the numbers mean. You should thank me by giving me a big, fat discount if I buy something from you. ;)
http://www.unofficialbmw.com/e36/suspension/e36_m3_more_hr_spring_part_numbers.html
Jim Powell "POWELL"<jim.powell_at_ada.com> writes: <snip>
> I spoke with Roland last Thursday (3/5) and watch out. The 29910 is
> for the '95 M3. my '98 and perhaps the 96-97 requires the 29910.2
> set. this is because the top spring seat is different. H&R
> documentation in their own box is less than helpful boys and girls.
> Call Roland and verify what you need to buy. He's a very nice guy
> BTW.
I spoke to Roland at H&R today to clarify, and yes, he is a very helpful guy.
Here's the deal. The front strut upper spring perch was reduced in diameter by about 10 mm after the 95 model year. If you have the factory 3.2 engine (96 model year and later), you have the new smaller spring perch.
This necessitates a corresponding change to the upper coils of the H&R springs, designated by p/n 29910.2 vs. 29910 for the 95 M3.
Also, in addition to the H&R springs listed in Carl Buckland's post (which started this discussion) there is the 29936 (M3 rear only) which lowers the back by almost 1.5", compared to 0.75" for the otherwise similar 29910. This was developed for those who felt that the rear looks too high with the otherwise similar 29910.
I add:
The small or large spring perches along with their rubber cushion liners can in fact be interchanged should it become necessary for some reason to fit 3.2 H&R springs to a 3.0 car or vice versa.
It should be pretty obvious if anyone ends up with the wrong front spring/perch combination, since the springs wouldn't seat properly at the top.
Thanks to Jim Powell for flagging this issue, and to Carl for posting the initial information.
Neil
96 M3
M3zie
06-01-2007, 04:43 PM
Wow the 29936 rears lower almost 1 inch more? Thats odd...
Any ride height differences between the front springs?