View Full Version : 2006 BMW M Roadster


Kevlar
01-02-2007, 03:39 PM
HOOO RAHHHH! Damn... this is a fun car. Granted, this car is not a test mule and is my own personal car, it's hard to give a full writeup as I'm not as likely to beat on my own car without having it properly broken in.

I can say this much so far ... this is going to be a fun car and it's also going to be a handful to drive hard. First of all... give up every notion you have about it being like an M3. It's nothing like an M3. The engine, brake and suspension may be similar, but when it comes to actually making them work in harmony... nothing like the M3.

The biggest thing you notice when you drive this car compared to any other car is the seating position. When you are in this car, you are not in the middle or in the center of all the activity. You are basically following the engine around as you sit in the trunk. Try it, go into your car and sit in the trunk and try driving it around... feels strange yes? It's not a bad thing... just different.

That being said, the interior of the car is purpose built... to drive. No frills, no extra storage space ... no nothing. I think it is one of the few cars where the glovebox is designed to hold just that, gloves ... nothing else. The only storage space you have it behind your right elbow (on US models) where you can store a few nick nacks but nothing large and definitely nothing odd shaped. The rest of the car is assembled, just for you and your briefcase ... or if somebody is lucky (or had paid you a healthy amount of money) a passenger.

Being that the car is new, the engine feels tight, but power output is definitely up there. Way more power feeling than that of say a Porsche Cayman (see the review). Punching the throttle at any part of the RPM band leaves you and your neck fighting the forces of physics trying to push you into the seat. The engine makes harmonious noises... nothing like that of an M3. No chainsaw like rasp, just a nice growl as it surges ahead. With the top down, you can also hear that hint of that marveloous engine growl out of the exhaust as you quickly depart from your current location.

Handling wise... there is definitely understeer preset. However, a stab of the throttle quickly turns that understeer into oversteer. If you are not paying attention, the traction control will jump in and reel you in with extreme vilagence... however, that's no fun, so traction control is off for really playing around (in a safe controlled environment). Be forwarned tho, that tail is very happy when at speed and will twitch and break free quite easily if provoked. Yes there is understeer, but there is also plenty of oversteer that will send you spinning into the scenery if you are not careful. The suspension, while tight is also very comforatle allowing it to soak up most bumps without having to adjust your spinal column. However, toss it into a corner and the suspension sets and the go-kart handling commences.

The brakes are quite potent but are typical BMW brake pads, dust like there is no tomorrow. No high speed braking tests were done because ... in all honesty, I didn't want to have to spend hours cleaning off my wheels from the baked on brake dust that would accumulate. More braking tests will be done after the pads are changed for something more dust friendly.

twhlax3
01-31-2007, 02:47 AM
i love the seating position on these cars. pure roadster goodness. the exhaust sounds incredible when you have the top down and it is immediately behind you.

i like the sleek looks of the coupe and you feel plain evil sitting that far back in the cabin.

the interior storage seems practical enough for me, i like the easy-to reach storage behind your elbow.

if i don't travel the world after i graduate college in two years the m coupe will be a definite purchase for me!!

congrats on the roadster purchase kevlar, post some media of that puppy goin' hard.

Spargo
02-01-2007, 01:22 PM
From what i heard on top gear (review by hammond) this thing is like a wild dog you just have to grab by the scruff of the neck and toss around. Sounds like a riot ha ha. Kev as usual your reviews are excelent.

-Spargo

Kevlar
02-01-2007, 01:52 PM
Thanks ... I've gotten used to the roadster seating position. The blind spots over your left and right shoulders with the top up are a bit annoying and make pulling out of parking spots backwards difficult and unnerving. The car is much more biased to oversteer than the M3. The M3 was very understeer biased but I've found myself on more than one accasional dialling in countersteer on fast rough corners.

Hugo
02-02-2007, 12:32 PM
.

The brakes are quite potent but are typical BMW brake pads, just like there is no tomorrow.


I think you meant «DUST».

Oh, and if you think a Z4 is tail-happy... try a Z3. :D

GMM
02-04-2007, 09:56 PM
Can we get an in car video kev? Thatd be awesome!

tonyg
03-21-2007, 11:02 AM
awesome car. Lets see that thing on the track!

///M USMC
04-06-2007, 05:50 PM
Nice write up, I wish that I could afford one of those. Every time I see one on the road, ill follow it just to stare.

Blue330i2006
03-22-2008, 05:38 AM
I am looking at the '08, differences 06-08? should I get a used one if no differences?And a little more review please as i know she is broken in now.

Thanx.

Kevlar
03-22-2008, 10:37 AM
The differences between 06 and 08 are that the newer models have an active tire pressure sensor instead of the passive ones (changed in for MY 07). This means if you change wheels, you have to remove the sensors from your old rims or buy new sensors.

I'll punch out a longer review a little later.

Blue330i2006
03-24-2008, 05:57 AM
If that is the only difference, then the price point will make the decision. Thanx!

dave330i
03-25-2008, 12:40 PM
Pretty sure BMW put CDV in your roadster. Remove it for better clutch action.

Kevlar
03-25-2008, 02:34 PM
My clutch is just fine ... CDV or not.

Alin10123
05-13-2008, 10:28 PM
Kevlar,
Had you had a chance to break the car in yet? How does it feel after break in? Could you do a full review? Have you had a chance to drive her hard yet?

I'm debating between this and the e39 M5. I know... two different animals. I've always loved the M5 since it came out. But the current gen M roadster... well..

:drool:

Kevlar
05-13-2008, 11:10 PM
The car has nearly 24000 miles on it now ... it's well broken in. This video sums up exactly what I think so far.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fj_AktfcIw

The car is a blast to drive. My only problems with the car are few. It takes a little while to find a seating position that is comfortable due to the limited seat travel. The floor mats wore out faster than any other car I've had in my life (maybe changing gears too much). After 8k miles my clutch heel had worn a hole right through the carpet. Another minor gripe... the steering wheel is peeling. The area that has the button for the radio volume and channel have worn off. Finally... the bluetooth cell link kinda sucks. The bluetooth has a hard time understanding me if driving with the top up over 60 and there is no way to send a call to voicemail when I'm driving with the top down and can't answer the phone. So I have to wait for it to ring out.

On a positive note... it is one hell of a car to drive. Tires lasted longer on this car than they did on the M3 ... but then again, they were continentals as opposed to michelins. Driving with the top down is super fun and the top is so fast, I can do it at stoplights without worry. The handling is great as long as you know what to expect. It's not the surgical tool of a Porsche, but it's just as fun.

I have decided to forego track days in this car... at least for the time being, maybe later after the summer has passed.

ovrkll
06-20-2008, 07:20 PM
I do hope that you ditched the Conti's for a much better tire!

Not to mention that an upgrade of the brake pads are recommended if you plan of tossing the car around, since I noticed a lot of brake fade while running The Dragon in NC/TN a few weeks back.


Wanted to add a few smilies to make a point here and there, but alas, us newbies are not qualified to make a statement! :P

ovrkll
06-20-2008, 07:33 PM
The Z4, like all BMW's now built, are suspension tuned to understeer in most situations. It is a safety factor for the average driver. Yes, as Kevlar pointed out, you can induce oversteer fairly easy if you have DSC off and wish to play.
The Z4M is a very agile car, on par with my old MINI in a sharp corner, but has the power to actually come out of a corner with extreme prejudice. This is where the tail happy parts can easily happen.
Knowing your limits is probably the most important part! Take it to a track, and find out the limits without putting yourself, or others, into danger.

Kevlar
06-21-2008, 03:40 PM
The Conti's were a crap tire ... but I couldn't bring myself to swap out a perfect good set of tires with so much tread left. They lost their useable grip somewhere around 6-7000 miles, but still had plenty of tread left until just short of 20k miles. The tires lasted the longest by far, but driving on them was down right dangerous out to 20k miles even with tread left on them.

I replaced them with the Sumitomo HTR Z III because on paper they were very close amost identical to the Michelin PS2 ... for half the price. Turns out what is true on paper isn't true in the real work. After 4000 miles, the Sumitomos lost the grip they had and now are the equivalent of the Continentals. Lots of tread left ... but no stick. Just goes to show... I should've not been cheap and bought the Michelins. You live and learn I guess.

MikeVance
06-22-2008, 07:07 AM
great post. and a great looking car.

Andrus7
06-27-2008, 04:09 AM
love the white color on it.

Never driven it myself, but on the passenger side it seemed already lot of fun.