View Full Version : Drove an '05 CTS-V


ss109
06-13-2005, 10:54 PM
Today I stopped by the Cadillac dealership to look at the new CTS-V. They had eight of them, a couple blues, three reds, and three silvers. Oh, and a black used one. Being that I am in the market for a new car, I thought I would give it a shot.

I thought I would look at the used black one. '05 model with 1500 miles on it. Just one problem, we couldn't get it to start. We thought it was probably the battery, so the salesman got one of those portable jumpers. No click. Well this car is off to a good start in my book...

We move over to one of the new silver ones. Starts without any trouble attached to the battery jumper. Brake rotors were solid rust, so I guess this one hadn't been moved in a while. I did like the looks of the silver mesh on the silver body - and this one had black leather interior with white stitching. Looked great in my book. Brakes looked impressive with large discs and multiple piston calipers.

We moved it out of the spot so I could open the door. Akward shaped interior door handle. A twisted metal type. And I'm not sure I was comfortable with the twenty-some buttons located on the drivers door. Looks like a mess if I was in a hurry. After getting situated, we took off. Well, after I found the e-brake. I wonder if GM could place that any closer to the clutch. HORRIBLE idea, GM. I can see somebody's foot slipping off the plastic clutch pedal onto the e-brake. I think they could've spent a few more dollars on this aspect and placed a vertical lever.

Clutch engagement point was kinda sketchy. Almost as if it compensated for bad drivers. When sitting still with the selector in first, you can slowly let out on the clutch until the rpms begin dropping, and the they will shoot up to the normal idle again, and then begin dropping. Very wide release point. Gear selection was precise, but not notchy. Seemed like an awfully long throw, even more so than other GM offerings, such as the GTO.

Brakes are very touchy - but made the car stop. I was impressed by the braking power of the car - it rivaled the 993 brakes on my 2900lb M3. However, I did feel that faded quite quickly, especially on the street. Throughout my fourty-five minute drive, I noticed the brakes getting softer and softer and my stopping distances increasing. The brake pedal is also a good couple inches closer to the driver than the gas, making the possibility of heel-toeing almost non-existant.

I felt the dash layout was decent. Not as driver oriented as a european car, but decent. However, when shifting into first, third, or fifth gears, my hand would hit the climate control buttons changing the vent selection or speed. Not very much space between the gear selector and the lower dash. Radio, GPS, etc was very intuitive and I was comfortable with it in about five minutes. The dash did have a crazy diamond shape texture on the whole thing that looks like a horrible trap for dirt and dust.

The power delivery was very smooth, although not as much as I expected. There wasn't a lot of me getting pushed back in my seat - if you know what I mean. First gear seamed longer than it should've been, and third gear was lousy. Sixth gear had more pep than I expected.

I'm not sure where this car fits in the current line-up. Yes, it's faster than the CTS, but would get whipped by a $30k GTO or a $52k Vette. I guess it's a luxury sedan in the middle of those two with an identity crisis. I don't believe I will be buying one, but definatly an interesting drive.

-LAB

Mblaster
06-14-2005, 10:11 AM
Nice writeup. I drove one too and I didn't like the axelhop.
If I was looking at GM I'd seriously look at the 05GTO.
LS2 and room for 4. For 30K it can't be beat.

s54gasm
07-19-2005, 08:13 PM
im calling :bs: on this write up. CTS-V's dont come in blue. although you could have mistaken a regular CTS for a V

GoBLue
07-20-2005, 11:41 AM
im calling :bs: on this write up. CTS-V's dont come in blue. although you could have mistaken a regular CTS for a V

It's called Stealth Gray, however it is a shade of blue.

s54gasm
07-21-2005, 03:41 PM
i wouldnt call it a blue.

GoBLue
07-22-2005, 07:48 AM
i wouldnt call it a blue.

Than what the hell would you call it?!

http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/imglib/colors.html

ss109
07-22-2005, 11:10 AM
im calling :bs: on this write up. CTS-V's dont come in blue. although you could have mistaken a regular CTS for a V

You're a moron.

s54gasm
07-22-2005, 07:27 PM
Than what the hell would you call it?!

http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/imglib/colors.html

grey

Roffle Waffle
07-23-2005, 01:50 AM
stealth

SleepRM3
07-27-2005, 10:54 PM
The Cadillac salesman did not offer a test drive in the CTS V. No point in wasting his time according to your review :stickoutt Today I stopped by the Cadillac dealership to look at the new CTS-V. They had eight of them, a couple blues, three reds, and three silvers. Oh, and a black used one. Being that I am in the market for a new car, I thought I would give it a shot.

I thought I would look at the used black one. '05 model with 1500 miles on it. Just one problem, we couldn't get it to start. We thought it was probably the battery, so the salesman got one of those portable jumpers. No click. Well this car is off to a good start in my book...

We move over to one of the new silver ones. Starts without any trouble attached to the battery jumper. Brake rotors were solid rust, so I guess this one hadn't been moved in a while. I did like the looks of the silver mesh on the silver body - and this one had black leather interior with white stitching. Looked great in my book. Brakes looked impressive with large discs and multiple piston calipers.

We moved it out of the spot so I could open the door. Akward shaped interior door handle. A twisted metal type. And I'm not sure I was comfortable with the twenty-some buttons located on the drivers door. Looks like a mess if I was in a hurry. After getting situated, we took off. Well, after I found the e-brake. I wonder if GM could place that any closer to the clutch. HORRIBLE idea, GM. I can see somebody's foot slipping off the plastic clutch pedal onto the e-brake. I think they could've spent a few more dollars on this aspect and placed a vertical lever.

Clutch engagement point was kinda sketchy. Almost as if it compensated for bad drivers. When sitting still with the selector in first, you can slowly let out on the clutch until the rpms begin dropping, and the they will shoot up to the normal idle again, and then begin dropping. Very wide release point. Gear selection was precise, but not notchy. Seemed like an awfully long throw, even more so than other GM offerings, such as the GTO.

Brakes are very touchy - but made the car stop. I was impressed by the braking power of the car - it rivaled the 993 brakes on my 2900lb M3. However, I did feel that faded quite quickly, especially on the street. Throughout my fourty-five minute drive, I noticed the brakes getting softer and softer and my stopping distances increasing. The brake pedal is also a good couple inches closer to the driver than the gas, making the possibility of heel-toeing almost non-existant.

I felt the dash layout was decent. Not as driver oriented as a european car, but decent. However, when shifting into first, third, or fifth gears, my hand would hit the climate control buttons changing the vent selection or speed. Not very much space between the gear selector and the lower dash. Radio, GPS, etc was very intuitive and I was comfortable with it in about five minutes. The dash did have a crazy diamond shape texture on the whole thing that looks like a horrible trap for dirt and dust.

The power delivery was very smooth, although not as much as I expected. There wasn't a lot of me getting pushed back in my seat - if you know what I mean. First gear seamed longer than it should've been, and third gear was lousy. Sixth gear had more pep than I expected.

I'm not sure where this car fits in the current line-up. Yes, it's faster than the CTS, but would get whipped by a $30k GTO or a $52k Vette. I guess it's a luxury sedan in the middle of those two with an identity crisis. I don't believe I will be buying one, but definatly an interesting drive.

-LAB

builder
08-05-2005, 12:43 PM
looks blue to me

rcM3
10-04-2005, 02:59 AM
i'd call it blue at first glance. But then again there are no blue e36 m3s, just estoril and avus.

MdMcoupe
10-05-2005, 09:41 PM
I'd call it GAY!!!;)

Although I do like the car itself, just not in that GAY BLUE GREY!

CDCJON551
10-14-2005, 01:57 AM
I'd call it GAY!!!;)
Although I do like the car itself, just not in that GAY BLUE GREY!
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

MtechnicE36
10-15-2005, 01:51 PM
I know a woman who was driving home from the dealership, made it 20 miles and the rear diff froze up, destroying the transmission as well. Apparently thesre was NO FLUID in the diff when she got it. The car had 20 miles

GreekDriver
10-15-2005, 04:10 PM
I like the styling of the CTS alot. It's very aggressive compared to the boring stuff everybody else is making.

323I Junkie
03-30-2006, 10:16 PM
I know a woman who was driving home from the dealership, made it 20 miles and the rear diff froze up, destroying the transmission as well. Apparently thesre was NO FLUID in the diff when she got it. The car had 20 miles


Id like to be the tech who PDI'd that car.

Teh Fire

BMW750il&AudiA6
02-08-2007, 02:22 PM
i think they are a great car, i would love to drive one, they have gotten good reviews from most of the magizines, and do 0-60 in less then 5 seconds and are supposed to handled pretty damn good, i would drive one

Young Version
02-08-2007, 07:29 PM
Since my M3 is currently in the shop, I've been driving my dad's CTS-V.


It's a beast. However, if it were my money, I would have looked elsewhere. I HATE the seating position and the lack of steering feel.

I did notice, though, that it doesn't really feel like it pushes you back in the seat. It's just an illusion; it's much faster than my car.

sar5036
04-23-2007, 01:42 AM
theres a black one that always parked outside of my one class that i think is real hot. unfortunately after this review it loses a bit of cred. seems like it could have been good if anyone but GM made it

Gregg
04-23-2007, 03:03 PM
Than what the hell would you call it?!

http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/imglib/colors.html

A blue so stealth you think it's grey!

inkface
09-26-2007, 02:49 PM
when they very first came out i saw one @ a shell station. and the rear end was making a clicking noise

lol

petern101
10-01-2007, 08:20 PM
just look at the depreciation thru the years for cts-v's

makes you wonder (noticed it when my brother was looking into it)

Bsaint
10-01-2007, 09:18 PM
Friend has one, corsa exhaust, headers springs shocks, it's fun :)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DRBdUPPzBqo

that is his beater, next to the 1,100whp z06 haha

Sal Collaziano
04-24-2008, 03:17 AM
I'm not sure where this car fits in the current line-up. Yes, it's faster than the CTS, but would get whipped by a $30k GTO

The CTS-V would not get whipped by ANY stock GTO. At any cost, it looks like the 2009 CTS-V will be doing 0-60 in under 4 seconds... Pretty nice for a fairly luxurious automobile...

CAJUN
04-30-2008, 05:32 PM
Friend has one, corsa exhaust, headers springs shocks, it's fun :)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DRBdUPPzBqo

that is his beater, next to the 1,100whp z06 haha



Great dorifto camera work @0:30 to 0:48 !!!! :buttrock