TopasBlau46
08-06-2008, 10:12 AM
so i finally had my car that i was paying my dad back for, using him merely as a bank and loan system, signed over to me yesterday. had to redo two inspections, obtain new plates and registrations and transfer the title, and of course redo all of the insurance plan (thankfully it's equally expensive! how? i dont know).
so of course within 10 minutes of leaving the registry i'm going 41mph in a 35mph zone on woodland road in stoneham, which the area itself is near malden/medford/melrose too. of course i get pulled over, god knows why. the officer asks me if i know why i was pulled over. of course i have some clue, which makes up probably 99% of the times cops pull anyone over. but i answer "no".
he asks how fast i thought i was going. i reply, "40, 41mph tops", also knowing that the spedometer on BMWS are allowed to read you're going 1MPH slower than you actually are, and 4MPH faster than you actually are. he claims to have clocked me at 50mph. so he writes up my ticket, and then hands it to me, after being a cold asshole and saying i shouldn't say good afternoon, because apparently 11:00AM is still the morning, and then just holding his hand out, without saying a word waiting for my license and registration.
anyways, i read the ticket, and it says 42mph in a 35 zone, but on the official line, he writes 45 in a 35 zone. then the box he ticked was "methods used: radar AND estimation". WTF! so of course I ask which method he used, and why he gave two different numbers different from the one he initially gave me, and he claimed he was giving me a "break". I then ask whether he estimated, or used a speed gun, because even the best of cops can't differentiate between 40 and 43, or 43 and 45mph. he answers, he used both. riiight.
all things considered, he was an asshole. had i been actually speeding and going 50mph+, i would have completely understood and taken the situation with way more humility.
as you can imagine, i'm most certainly not paying this and plan to challenge it, as there were plenty of cars around me he could have been aiming at, two of which were in the right lane going faster than me (passing in the right lane, and "speeding" faster than i, how is that legal, if i'm "breaking the law"), and the fact he contradicts himself three times with three different numbers, and then goes on to say he estimated. well sir, you can't "estimate" when your "estimation" and the speed limit and speed i was actually going were in such close proximity.
can't wait to see this sucker in court.
sorry for the rant.
but really the reason i wanted to post this is that i've realized there have been A LOT of troopers around the boston area and 10 miles outwards in every direction from the city, ESPECIALLY on tuesdays. so heads up! :shifty must be time for the state to make some money, god knows the tolls don't do that for us :lol
so of course within 10 minutes of leaving the registry i'm going 41mph in a 35mph zone on woodland road in stoneham, which the area itself is near malden/medford/melrose too. of course i get pulled over, god knows why. the officer asks me if i know why i was pulled over. of course i have some clue, which makes up probably 99% of the times cops pull anyone over. but i answer "no".
he asks how fast i thought i was going. i reply, "40, 41mph tops", also knowing that the spedometer on BMWS are allowed to read you're going 1MPH slower than you actually are, and 4MPH faster than you actually are. he claims to have clocked me at 50mph. so he writes up my ticket, and then hands it to me, after being a cold asshole and saying i shouldn't say good afternoon, because apparently 11:00AM is still the morning, and then just holding his hand out, without saying a word waiting for my license and registration.
anyways, i read the ticket, and it says 42mph in a 35 zone, but on the official line, he writes 45 in a 35 zone. then the box he ticked was "methods used: radar AND estimation". WTF! so of course I ask which method he used, and why he gave two different numbers different from the one he initially gave me, and he claimed he was giving me a "break". I then ask whether he estimated, or used a speed gun, because even the best of cops can't differentiate between 40 and 43, or 43 and 45mph. he answers, he used both. riiight.
all things considered, he was an asshole. had i been actually speeding and going 50mph+, i would have completely understood and taken the situation with way more humility.
as you can imagine, i'm most certainly not paying this and plan to challenge it, as there were plenty of cars around me he could have been aiming at, two of which were in the right lane going faster than me (passing in the right lane, and "speeding" faster than i, how is that legal, if i'm "breaking the law"), and the fact he contradicts himself three times with three different numbers, and then goes on to say he estimated. well sir, you can't "estimate" when your "estimation" and the speed limit and speed i was actually going were in such close proximity.
can't wait to see this sucker in court.
sorry for the rant.
but really the reason i wanted to post this is that i've realized there have been A LOT of troopers around the boston area and 10 miles outwards in every direction from the city, ESPECIALLY on tuesdays. so heads up! :shifty must be time for the state to make some money, god knows the tolls don't do that for us :lol